Wednesday, September 15, 2021
Magic of the Muses: Schizophrenic writer tells crazy story
Magic of the Muses: Schizophrenic writer tells crazy story: Despite what my headline infers, author Kenna Mckinnon has not let mental illness define her. As a child and teen she led a 'normal'...
Wednesday, April 01, 2020
Magic of the Muses: Toss the Bottle
Magic of the Muses: Toss the Bottle: The fifth is a series of Mental Health blogs for Covid19 Disclosure Toss the Bottle ~ EileenSchuh.com © Put away the pint, wi...
Eileen Schuh,
Canadian writer
www.eileenschuh.com
Eileen Schuh,
Canadian writer
www.eileenschuh.com
Wednesday, March 25, 2020
Magic of the Muses: The Write Way to deal with Covid19
Magic of the Muses: The Write Way to deal with Covid19: For Therapy, for Posterity, write your life Disclosure I gave a little teaser on Facebook today about what I was going to blog about on ...
Eileen Schuh,
Canadian writer
www.eileenschuh.com
Eileen Schuh,
Canadian writer
www.eileenschuh.com
Tuesday, March 24, 2020
Magic of the Muses: Be here Be now Be gentle with yourself
Magic of the Muses: Be here Be now Be gentle with yourself: [Disclosure] #Covid19 Small steps to Mental Health I'm going to drop the numbering of my Mental Health steps as nobody is going to f...
Eileen Schuh,
Canadian writer
www.eileenschuh.com
Eileen Schuh,
Canadian writer
www.eileenschuh.com
Monday, March 23, 2020
Magic of the Muses: COVID19 Second Step to Mental Health
Magic of the Muses: COVID19 Second Step to Mental Health: Using our words Disclaimer Yesterday I blogged about the importance of assigning words to one's emotions, one's fears, how t...
Eileen Schuh,
Canadian writer
www.eileenschuh.com
Eileen Schuh,
Canadian writer
www.eileenschuh.com
Magic of the Muses: COVID19 Second Step to Mental Health
Magic of the Muses: COVID19 Second Step to Mental Health: Using our words Disclaimer Yesterday I blogged about the importance of assigning words to one's emotions, one's fears, how t...
Eileen Schuh,
Canadian writer
www.eileenschuh.com
Eileen Schuh,
Canadian writer
www.eileenschuh.com
Sunday, March 22, 2020
Magic of the Muses: First steps out of the Covid19 crisis
Magic of the Muses: First steps out of the Covid19 crisis: [disclaimer] Find the words The overwhelming response to my casual mention on facebook that I was considering using my writing skills an...
Eileen Schuh,
Canadian writer
www.eileenschuh.com
Eileen Schuh,
Canadian writer
www.eileenschuh.com
Wednesday, September 25, 2019
Rural Crime: The politician speaks
Criminal Minds at Work is honoured to have Doug Schweitzer, Alberta’s Minister of Justice
and Solicitor General, as a guest today.
In the following op-ed, the Hon. Doug Schweitzer addresses concerns regarding Alberta's rural crime and law enforcement. As a victim of rural crime myself, I am interested in what he has to say.
With police often a good half-hour or more away from rural properties, criminals know that no matter the security system residents might have, they have plenty of time to take what they want and not get caught. This criminal boldness is fueling fear and anger in rural Albertans and potentially escalating property crimes to the level of violent crimes.
Let's see what the Minister has in mind:
Clearing the Air on Police Funding
The first duty of government is to protect the safety of
law-abiding Albertans. After the NDP sat on their hands for four
years as crime rates skyrocketed in many rural communities, Albertans gave
the United Conservative Party a historic mandate to keep Albertans safe, secure
and protected.
Our government is committed to giving law enforcement the
tools and resources necessary to ensure there is a sustainable reduction in
crime and Albertans have confidence that their justice system
will protect them, their loved ones and their property.
To ensure we have a law enforcement system that enhances
public safety and emphasizes frontline policing, our government
is fulfilling our campaign promise to review how police are funded in
Alberta. The current model has resulted in a shortage of policing
services. We’ve been listening to Albertans, municipalities and others
and are asking for feedback on a number of models on how police
should be funded.
To be clear: our goal is more police services. If any
new funding model that would collect funds from more municipalities
is chosen, any funds collected would be reinvested in frontline policing and
would lead to an overall increase in funding for police services in Alberta. It
would lead to more police funding, not less. Any assertion to the
contrary is absolutely, one-hundred per cent false. And unlike the NDP’s
carbon tax, this is not a cash grab.
It is the height of hypocrisy for the NDP to profess concern
for the safety of Albertans. Their failure to adequately fund law
enforcement and criminal justice resulted in a revolving-door justice system
where Albertans lost faith in the ability of government to protect them.
Rural Albertans deserve better. That’s why they elected
a government that will ensure the justice system reflects the realities of
rural Alberta. While the NDP ignored the needs of rural Albertans, we are
listening. While they talk, we are taking action. I have been conducting
the most comprehensive consultation on rural crime and rural policing in
Alberta’s history, traveling the province to hear from as many Albertans as
possible to help ensure we have safer and more secure communities.
Ensuring Albertans feel – and are – safe and protected goes
to the heart of who we are as a government. We want to make sure we
fund law enforcement in a way that will enhance public safety
for all Albertans and ensure we have more police in our
communities.
Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.
- Doug
Schweitzer, Minister of Justice and Solicitor General
Rural Crime: The politician speaks is brought to you by The BackTracker Series--rural crime in Alberta at its most violent best...
Labels:
Alberta crime,
Back Tracker series,
Canadian writer,
Doug Schweitzer,
Eileen Schuh,
law enforcement,
law enforcement in a rural area,
Minister of Justice,
Op-ed,
policing,
Solicitor General
Tuesday, June 05, 2018
Genetically modified...
According a recent MacLean's article, "Canadians ate 4.5 tonnes of unlabelled GM salmon without knowing it this past year"
The world has not been able to unite on the issue of genetic modification. There's no consensus on whether or not genetically modifying our food sources is safe, or how informed consumers should be, how it should be labeled, and whether or not it should even be occurring.
Some say tinkering with nature is sure to lead to disaster while others are enthused that science is finding a way to safely feed a burgeoning world population. Who are we to believe? Who are we to trust?
Is it true that selective-breeding programs and other farming practices down through the ages, and even the natural selection processes of evolution, shows us that genetic modification has been going on since the beginning of life on our planet? Is it only our legends and lore and imaginations that make the whole field of GMO seem so apocalyptic? In truth, emotions aside, is it a rational, safe and scientific endeavor?
Are our fears about 'where will it lead?', unfounded in fact and merely incubating in ancient stories of monsters and critters half man and half beast?
Now that we can read human DNA are we going to disastrously tinker with it and make ourselves unbelievable villains or super heroes? Disease-free. An immortal, burgeoning population surviving on mass-produced GMO organisms?
Do we need some laws in this regard? Some international standards, perhaps?
In my upcoming trilogy, Project W. Olf, I look at the results of some fictional human genetic manipulations, and the role activists and governments, communities and companies need to play to keep us safe. Because if we don't act now, we will be so behind with our laws, criminals will have a strangle hold on GMO processes and commercialization and laws will be useless--much like what has happened in cyberspace.
The need for moral and ethical standards is clear.
Genetically Modified has been brought to you by DISPASSIONATE LIES
Who controls cyberspace?
The world has not been able to unite on the issue of genetic modification. There's no consensus on whether or not genetically modifying our food sources is safe, or how informed consumers should be, how it should be labeled, and whether or not it should even be occurring.
Some say tinkering with nature is sure to lead to disaster while others are enthused that science is finding a way to safely feed a burgeoning world population. Who are we to believe? Who are we to trust?
Is it true that selective-breeding programs and other farming practices down through the ages, and even the natural selection processes of evolution, shows us that genetic modification has been going on since the beginning of life on our planet? Is it only our legends and lore and imaginations that make the whole field of GMO seem so apocalyptic? In truth, emotions aside, is it a rational, safe and scientific endeavor?
Are our fears about 'where will it lead?', unfounded in fact and merely incubating in ancient stories of monsters and critters half man and half beast?
Now that we can read human DNA are we going to disastrously tinker with it and make ourselves unbelievable villains or super heroes? Disease-free. An immortal, burgeoning population surviving on mass-produced GMO organisms?
Do we need some laws in this regard? Some international standards, perhaps?
In my upcoming trilogy, Project W. Olf, I look at the results of some fictional human genetic manipulations, and the role activists and governments, communities and companies need to play to keep us safe. Because if we don't act now, we will be so behind with our laws, criminals will have a strangle hold on GMO processes and commercialization and laws will be useless--much like what has happened in cyberspace.
The need for moral and ethical standards is clear.
Genetically Modified has been brought to you by DISPASSIONATE LIES
Who controls cyberspace?
Labels:
Canadian Author,
Dispassionate Lies,
DNA,
Eileen Schuh,
genetic manipulation,
genetic modification,
GMO,
Project W.Olf,
salmon
Wednesday, March 28, 2018
#DeleteFacebook
Yes, I'm still on Facebook despite the kerfuffle in the news about the role Facebook data may have played in Cambridge Analytica and AggregateIQ's efforts to sway elections.
I'm having a hard time believing anything I said or did affected Brexit, Trump's election, or even Trudeau's election.
I'm just not able to get upset that fb shared what I said and/or did or their site Perhaps my dispassion is because I, too, use Facebook for 'nefarious' reasons--like selling my books. The more my posts and name gets shared around the world, the happier I am. The more my friends become your friends and your friends, mine--the more we get together the happier I am. Free advertising and all that jazz.
Yeah, Facebook! A platform that reaches billions and doesn't cost me a penny.
I'm clever enough to realize the best things in life are not free, and that facebook makes money from my presence. It has to make money or it wouldn't exist for long unless it was funded by government or philanthropists. It doesn't bother me, it's the price I'm quite willing to pay in order to have a platform that reaches billions and doesn't cost me a penny.
As long as Facebook's profit doesn't involve stealing, killing, sharing or reselling my copyrighted materials--which there's no indication it has done--I'll play their game.
I've always understood the nature of this beast with which I've joined forces and followed these rules:
The downside of all this, though, that I must consider is that my Facebook friends may not have bought into my scenario, yet they apparently are at risk of world-wide exposure and malicious manipulation simply because they're my friends.
I advise my friends and all other Facebook users and social media users in general:
I'm having a hard time believing anything I said or did affected Brexit, Trump's election, or even Trudeau's election.
I'm just not able to get upset that fb shared what I said and/or did or their site Perhaps my dispassion is because I, too, use Facebook for 'nefarious' reasons--like selling my books. The more my posts and name gets shared around the world, the happier I am. The more my friends become your friends and your friends, mine--the more we get together the happier I am. Free advertising and all that jazz.
Yeah, Facebook! A platform that reaches billions and doesn't cost me a penny.
I'm clever enough to realize the best things in life are not free, and that facebook makes money from my presence. It has to make money or it wouldn't exist for long unless it was funded by government or philanthropists. It doesn't bother me, it's the price I'm quite willing to pay in order to have a platform that reaches billions and doesn't cost me a penny.
As long as Facebook's profit doesn't involve stealing, killing, sharing or reselling my copyrighted materials--which there's no indication it has done--I'll play their game.
I've always understood the nature of this beast with which I've joined forces and followed these rules:
- I have never posted anything that I wouldn't mind sharing with the world.
- I've never relied on Facebook as my news source.
- I've never liked things on Facebook when I didn't know their source.
- I've never posted, liked or shared anything promoting intolerance or hatred.
- Anything I want to say but would hesitate to say in person in public gets put in phone calls or offline messages.
- I'm not myself on Facebook, I'm an author with seven published novels looking to sell them.
The downside of all this, though, that I must consider is that my Facebook friends may not have bought into my scenario, yet they apparently are at risk of world-wide exposure and malicious manipulation simply because they're my friends.
I advise my friends and all other Facebook users and social media users in general:
- beware of fake news, ads, and manipulations
- don't share private things online
- respect others' privacy
- use the power of social media to make the world not only a more interesting place, but a safer and kinder one.
Labels:
#DeleteFacebook,
AggregaeIQ,
Cambridge Analytica,
Canadian Author,
Dispassionate Lies,
Eileen Schuh,
facebook,
social media
Monday, March 19, 2018
DNA and Privacy
When my kids gifted my husband and I Ancestry.ca DNA
testing kits, we both got a tad nervous.
Not so much because we feared what might be revealed about our past
(what’s done, is done and it all got us to a good spot in life), but more we
feared what that DNA might all be used for.
Could it ever be used against us in a court of law? To
identify us, when we’d rather not be known? To hike the cost of life or medical
insurance, should genetic weakness show up?
Could it foreseeably connect us to relatives we’d rather not
connect with? Could it connect us with Crime? With lawsuits? With parental
issues?
The Ancestry.ca kit did come with a questionnaire where you can choose to approve their request to use your DNA for further research (we declined
and asked our sample be destroyed after testing). You can also choose how
much of your information will get shared on their website, and with whom. Part
of their service is to connect you, via your DNA results, with other Ancestry
members who have been DNA tested. I declined sharing any of my results,
although I did allow them to list for me others whom I'm potentially related to.
You can also choose to download the raw data from their lab, but unless one
is a genetic scientist, it would be hard to decipher what the data means. Also,
once you request that download, Ancestry.ca no longer vouches for the
security and privacy of your results—because, presumably, they can’t monitor
who you decide to share the information with and how securely you go about
sharing it.
If this all sounds a bit paranoid, it perhaps is. Because
where ever one goes, one leaves behind one’s DNA. Just swab my fork after I
dine at Tony Roma’s and my DNA profile is yours.
It’s that fact, that led me to give in to my curiosity,
spit in the vial, and ship it off the Ancestry.ca lab in Ireland.
Let’s face it—there are no secrets anymore.
DNA and Privacy has been brought to you by Schrodinger’s Cat—Trapped
in two universes, two simultaneous lives. In one, her child is dying.
Eileen Schuh, Author
FIREWALLS
FATAL ERROR
Schrödinger's Cat
THE TRAZ
Web site: http://www.eileenschuh.com
Blog: http://eileenschuh.blogspot.com
Labels:
Ancestry.ca,
Ancestry.com,
Canadian Author,
DNA,
Eileen Schuh,
Schrodinger's Cat
Wednesday, January 10, 2018
Fire and Fury...
Lawsuits and Amendment Rights
Trump threatens the publisher and author of Fire and Fury with a lawsuit and the publisher responds by moving up the release date. We all chuckle.But as a journalist and author, the threat of a lawsuit always niggles around in the cockles of my mind. One always does one's best not be libelous or defamatory and always puts those little disclaimers in the front of the book about it being totally fictitious. And in the case of journalistic endeavors, one keeps meticulous notes, checks out one's sources, and runs things by lawyers.
The right to freedom of expression and freedom of the press, are very strong rights in democratic societies, but they are not absolute. Canada has hate laws, Germany has a law making Holocaust denial illegal. Most countries have laws against publishing state secrets and thus Snowden, Assange and Chelsea Manning got in legal trouble.
This balancing of an individual's freedoms and rights with what's 'right' for society is difficult for many of us. In my novel FATAL ERROR a disgruntled cop, in trying to make a living from a tell-all tale, unveils the identity of a young witness whose testimony helped bring down THE TRAZ biker gang.Although the police move to prevent publication of the book, they are Canadian cops and it's an American publisher--insisting on exercising first amendment rights. With cross-border jurisdictional confusion and the age-old battle between 'rights and freedoms' versus 'life and limb' things became very dicey for little Katrina.
When rights aren't absolute and the truth is open to interpretation, the ensuing struggles, though intense and unsettling, serve as great fodder for novels and movies.
Fire and Fury has been brought to you by FATAL ERROR, Book 2 in the BackTracker Series.
Labels:
BackTracker series,
Canadian Author,
donald trump,
Eileen Schuh,
Fatal Error,
Fire and Fury,
First amendment,
freedom of expression,
libel
Tuesday, October 31, 2017
It's not fair!
Around the age of eight or nine, childhood tantrums give way to plaintive tirades against how unjust life is. "It's not fair!"
"If life were fair," we wise adults retort, "we'd be born old and die young. People would fly and seagulls would walk."
"If Life Were Fair, Horses Would Ride Half the Time" (a book by Ben Goode)
"If life were fair, all the terrible things that happen to us, we'd actually deserve."
FATAL ERROR still makes me ponder both the fragility and strength of our legal system. It's a good read...
It's not fair! is brought to you by FATAL ERROR
Eileen Schuh, Author
FIREWALLS
FATAL ERROR
Schrödinger's Cat
THE TRAZ
Web site: http://www.eileenschuh.com
Blog: http://eileenschuh.blogspot.com
"If life were fair," we wise adults retort, "we'd be born old and die young. People would fly and seagulls would walk."
"If Life Were Fair, Horses Would Ride Half the Time" (a book by Ben Goode)
"If life were fair, all the terrible things that happen to us, we'd actually deserve."
Or as Johnny Carson once said, "If life were fair, Elvis would still be alive and all the impersonators would be dead.”
We start to develop a more mature sense of justice and fairness in our early to mid-teens, and an acceptance that no, life is not always fair.
Well into adulthood, though, we long to believe our justice system is fair, that our political institutions are equitable and principled--unless of course, we're looking for advantages for ourselves and our kin. Unless we believe we deserve a bit more than others...a bigger piece of the pie, a lesser part of the punishment.
In FATAL ERROR (2nd Edition), Book 2 of my BackTracker series, the equability of our justice system is explored from differing viewpoints--a young teen, law enforcement, prosecutors, the media, a biker gang.
As stated in the Book Club Discussion Guide at the back of the book:
Flexibility and fairness are hard concepts to balance, and not everyone is equal under the law, and circumstances both colour and taint justice."There are cultural differences in what is perceived as fair, leading to different laws and legal systems around the world. Canadian laws allows for justice to be tempered by circumstances yet at the same time, nobody is above the law—the same laws are supposed to apply to everyone equally."
FATAL ERROR still makes me ponder both the fragility and strength of our legal system. It's a good read...
It's not fair! is brought to you by FATAL ERROR
"Heartbreaking and triumphant"
"...a dialogue-driven plot with so much compassion"
“...a lesson and an intense drama in one.”
“Emotions run high in this book.”
“This book has so much to say; we all should listen."
“Rebellion, terror, drugs, murder, loss, lies, broken
promises—all are there.”
Eileen Schuh, Author
FIREWALLS
FATAL ERROR
Schrödinger's Cat
THE TRAZ
Web site: http://www.eileenschuh.com
Blog: http://eileenschuh.blogspot.com
Labels:
biker gangs,
Canadian Author,
crime,
Eileen Schuh,
Fatal Error,
Johnny Carson,
justice,
justice system,
sense of justice
Wednesday, October 11, 2017
#WantingToMakeADifference
"Scandal ripples through entertainment industry and beyond as Harvey Weinstein's accusers grow in number" - CBC news
How the open dirty secret remained unchallenged for so long is difficult to understand.
Law enforcement, the justice system, corporate American, everyday men and women and the victims themselves can't navigate rationally through the behaviors that accompany and follow relationship violence and abuse.
Yet it's imperative that we do come to understand how it works. We need to know so we can avoid the trap ourselves and teach others how. So we can quit blaming the victims. So we can raise a generation that doesn't accept or condone such violence.
"Why didn't she just....?" is a common refrain when we hear about abusive relationship. "If it was so bad, why didn't she....tell someone, report it to the police, breakup the relationship?"
"If it was so bad, why did she...keep seeing him, continue living with him, embark on a business relationship with him, speak well of him to others, text him, befriend him on facebook?"
I explore violent relationships in my recent novel, SHADOW RIDERS. It's my hope that readers will come to understand a little better the thought processes and emotional complexities that entangle women in violent relationships.
My novel is just a small start to understanding, to getting the conversation going.
As a writer, I feel compelled to at least try to understand this pressing social issue and at most, to make a positive change in my world.
#WantingToMakeADifference is brought to you by SHADOW RIDERS
"...anticipation and fear, sympathy and revulsion." SHADOW RIDERS
Eileen Schuh, Author
FIREWALLS
FATAL ERROR
Schrödinger's Cat
THE TRAZ
Web site: http://www.eileenschuh.com
Blog: http://eileenschuh.blogspot.com
Labels:
Canadian Author,
crime fiction,
domestic abuse,
domestic violence,
Eileen Schuh,
Harvey Weinstein,
Shadow Riders
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




